Re: HTML 3.2

Subject: Re: HTML 3.2
From: "Parks, Beverly L." <parksb -at- HUACHUCA-EMH7 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 08:21:00 MST

Yvonne DeGraw[SMTP:yvonne -at- silcom -dot- com] wrote:
>> Yes, HTML 3.0 is defunct. <<

Sorry if this is a stupid question. Since HTML 3.0 is history, would it
be a waste of one's money to purchase one of the many HTML 3.0 books that
are on the market?

I wonder why these books got published in the first place...
Were publishers just trying to get a jump start on the market, and it
turned out to be a bad decision?

Bev Parks
parksb -at- huachuca-emh7 -dot- army -dot- mil

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-

Previous by Author: Adobe Acrobat Support
Next by Author: Re: Words that end in - GRY
Previous by Thread: HTML 3.2
Next by Thread: Re: HTML 3.2

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads