Sugar (input and output)

Subject: Sugar (input and output)
From: Tom Neuburger <Tom_Neuburger -at- LTX-TR -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:15:58 -0600

Reply to: Sugar (input and output)


I take "input" to be like "sugar"--a collective noun, usually not counted.
Some sugar, lots of sugar. We would say "sugars" to mean many
kinds of sugar. So in that sense--one sugar, many sugars (beet sugar,
cane sugar, etc.).

The parallel is one input, lots of input, when input is considered a mass
or a quantity regardless of its "grains". But when the number of inputs
is important (as in this sentence), they are counted--one input, two

You're still left to decide when to use which construction. But
I think your ear for what sounds right should guide you well.

Hope this helps.

Tom Neuburger

Date: 8/14/96 3:04 AM
From: Rebecca Phillips
Are input and output plural nouns? Inputs and outputs sound wrong to me, =
but the engineers here seem to feel that since there is more than one =
thing input, it should be a plural.

Rebecca M. Phillips
Documentation Manager
Qronus Interactive Ltd.
rebecca -at- qronus -dot- co -dot- il

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-

Previous by Author: Re: Naming conventions
Next by Author: Moderated Techwr-l List?
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Midnight, noon, etc.
Next by Thread: Re: Meridiem: more than you wanted to know

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads