TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: personal attacks From:Sabahat Ashraf <sabahat -at- OPENIX -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 20 Aug 1996 13:17:58 -0400
Please don't get me wrong, I am not saying that ad hominem attacks are
okay. However, I disagree with a sweeping parallel between FTF and CMC
[impress 'em with abbr.'s -- Face-to-Face vs. Computer Mediated
> >Before you attack someone, ask if you'd do it face to face. If not,
> >don't do it via e-mail either.
and I think the following is as good a justification as I have seen for
making a distinction, thanks for making it before I had the time to
think one up, Mike:
> Electronic communication works both ways. Yes, it does allow a person
> to become a sniper. It also removes the formalities and intimidation
> that is inherent with face-to-face. What do I do if I want to attack
> someone's ideas face-to-face, only they are quite a bit bigger than me,
> ill-tempered, and not of the resolve to differentiate between an attack
> on their ideas and an attack on them? E-mail and newsgroups are a great
> equalizer. If I disagree with them, they can't hover over me, give me
> the look, crack their knuckles, and so forth in attempt to intimidate
> me. They must articulate.
Which is not to say that Electronic Communication does not have its
downside. My usual stand is that it is not better or worse; more
democratic or less, it is a different ballgame. For instance, it was
relying on only face to face, I would not be in touch with so many
technical communicators at one time either. I would certainly not be
able to talk back to people with much more experience than I do. [Like I
am right now? 8-)]
The following disclaimer stands for me as well.
> Disclaimer - I am in no way espousing personal attacks. They are
> deplorable. However, this medium is wide open to them. The same shield
> that electronic communication provides for you to express your ideas
> without intimidation also extends to any pariah with an Internet
> connection. Most flames burn out if not fed or fanned.
or, in more literary terms:
"I disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right
to say it."
sabahat -at- openix -dot- com - ashrafs -at- rpi -dot- edu - (201) 301 4232
"If I know your sect, I anticipate your argument"
Ralph Waldo Emerson
TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-