Re: personal attacks - relevance

Subject: Re: personal attacks - relevance
From: Sabahat Ashraf <sabahat -at- OPENIX -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:34:51 -0400

Yohanon Emek wrote:

> Someone tell me, in 10 words or less, how ^personal
> attacks^ = ^technical writing?^

My post was in the spirit that we, as technical communicators are most
suited to address issues concerning communication [the art] as it is
evolving in the electronic medium and, thus, should. If it was
off-topic, I apologize.

Also, my apologies for the typos in my last post.

Sabahat.
--
sabahat -at- openix -dot- com - ashrafs -at- rpi -dot- edu - (201) 301 4232
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"If I know your sect, I anticipate your argument"
Ralph Waldo Emerson

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-



Previous by Author: Re: personal attacks
Next by Author: Re: Manuals Written in Non-American English (Long - in two versions)
Previous by Thread: LANTRA
Next by Thread: Lantra -- about it


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads