Re: 3.1 or 95

Subject: Re: 3.1 or 95
From: Kris Olberg <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 09:46:48 -0700

At 07:37 AM 9/20/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>Jeesh, who knows? Nobody keeps that data. Any estimates would be almost
>>sheer SWAG. But I'd think, to be safe, the developers might want to stick to
>>16-bit apps so they'd run either place.
>>Tim Altom

>Sorry -- "SWAG"?

Short for "(something) wild-*ss guess." I can't remember what the "s" stands
for. Essentially, it translates to a wild guess.

kjolberg -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com (preferred)
kjolberg -at- aol -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com
102031 -dot- 3556 -at- compuserve -dot- com
s -dot- othoudt -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net

Previous by Author: Re: Until It's Time for Me to Go
Next by Author: Re: Obsession with University Degrees?
Previous by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95
Next by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads