Re: 3.1 or 95

Subject: Re: 3.1 or 95
From: Joanna Sheldon <cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 07:37:56 -0400

>Jeesh, who knows? Nobody keeps that data. Any estimates would be almost
>sheer SWAG. But I'd think, to be safe, the developers might want to stick to
>16-bit apps so they'd run either place.

>Tim Altom

Sorry -- "SWAG"?


Previous by Author: Re: PDF Files Are BMPs?
Next by Author: Re: TERM: URGENT - time-sensitive
Previous by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95
Next by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads