Re: 3.1 or 95

Subject: Re: 3.1 or 95
From: Tim Altom <taltom -at- IQUEST -dot- NET>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 06:03:00 EST

At 12:02 AM 9/20/96 -0400, you wrote:
>I need some information. One of my clients is going to put their college
level classes
>on the Internet. I write training manuals mostly for off-the-shelf
software. The are
>probable going to need to offer their computer courses in both Win 3.1 and
Win 95.

>Here is my question. (If this displays my ignorance please forgive me.) Do
more people
>access the Internet, e-mail and/or web/Web sites using 3.1 or 95.

>TIA,

>Laura Kilby
>Who is working most of the night and weekend trying to meet yet another
deadline. :)
>So what else is new in a contractor's life? ;)

Jeesh, who knows? Nobody keeps that data. Any estimates would be almost
sheer SWAG. But I'd think, to be safe, the developers might want to stick to
16-bit apps so they'd run either place.

Tim Altom
Vice President, Simply Written, Inc.
317.899.5882 (voice) 317.899.5987 (fax)
FrameMaker support ForeHelp support
FrameMaker-to-HTML Conversions

http://www.simplywritten.com/simply


Previous by Author: Re: Online vs. paper, my take
Next by Author: PDF Files Are BMPs?
Previous by Thread: 3.1 or 95
Next by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads