TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>>>Speaking of pet peeves - Does anyone else on this list have a problem =
with using 'since' to show the reason for something happening instead of
(what I think to be) the correct word 'because'? In my view 'since' =
strictly refers to time; 'because' refers to the reason something =
happens. Yet, I see 'since' quite often used to introduce the reason =
something occurred. This is my pet peeve. It's a little furry, but its
mine. What do you all think?
Advanced Technologies Group<<<
James J. Kilpatrick has a nice essay about this usage in _Fine Print_
[Paraphrasing]...Since, as a conjunction, can mean "inview of the fact
that" or "because" ... At least 99 times out of 100 _because_ is a
better word than _since_. Since can cause confusion because its first
meaning has to do with the passage of time. When we read _because_ we
know exactly where we are going.
I always change _since_ to _because_ when its meaning is "because" (a
reason) and not time passage in the work I do. I get no arguments from
the folks I work with.