TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Robohelp vs. HDK From:Steve Fouts <stefou -at- ESKIMO -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 1 Oct 1996 18:34:02 GMT
Foster, Betsy <BFoster -at- msmail -dot- hsii -dot- ccare -dot- com> wrote in article
<52pcco$2qq -at- news -dot- cis -dot- okstate -dot- edu>...
| I am responsible for choosing an online help authoring tool.
| I've narrowed the choices to Robohelp 95 and HDK. I'd appreciate the
| pros and cons of both programs.
My single biggest complaint about Robohelp was that it required MS Word.
Given a typical help development scenario, my machine would have to have
the following programs running at the same time:
MS Word Resource hog that it is.
Paint Shop Screen captures, button snags, yadda yadda yadda.
Extra! We have a mainframe. Most PC apps that we develop
require it. It isn't too tiny itself.
The App When I'm working with it, it is probably in debug
mode with a footprint about 5x what it'll be in
What else? At odd times the help compiler, shed editor, any
one of the cool utilities that come with Robohelp.
My calendar manager. Perhaps a news reader.
Even a fairly hot Pentium with a good deal of RAM groans under such
On the plus side, the WinHelp Office has a whole suite of utilites
(a lot of them used to be shareware and still kind of feel that
way) that are pretty helpful.