TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Copyright Issue/Exercise From:Rob Miller <Miller_Robert_C -at- 90 -dot- DEERE -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 7 Oct 1996 14:13:23 -0500
John Russell asks about copyright infringement:
> My colleague (he is not a lawyer) argues that this is not copyright
> infringement because what matters is not the fact that it is one
> graphics file from which substantial portions were copied, but rather
> how the information is perceived; that is, it is perceived as text
> and six images (or graphics?). While the formatting of the text is
> similar, the text itself is different--no copyright problem there.
> The six images (graphics?) are different--no copyright problem there.
> I'm safe, even though all of these elements are aspects (pieces) of a
> single graphics file--a single image.
> I, on the other hand, argue that because I copied what I believe is a
> "substantial portion" of the graphic/image (that is, of the single
> file that entails several images), that I may be in the copyright gray
The fundamental question here is: "substantial similarity." Is your
creation substantially similar to the model that you used? You write
that you copied a substantial portion of the image. Do you mean that
you copied identifiable graphic elements from the existing graphic? You
may be in copyright "trouble" for that specific element.
A good guideline to follow: Don't copy any graphic from someone else.
There is enough freeware and icon tools that no one should need to
borrow someone else's work.