Re: WARNING:Graphic_Language

Subject: Re: WARNING:Graphic_Language
From: "Virginia J. Link" <LINKVI -at- MAIL -dot- STATE -dot- WI -dot- US>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:04:10 -0600

Perhaps soon proposal and document production guidelines/standards (and
software capabilities) will also include converting documents to formats
accessible to the visually impaired, such as large print and braille, and
audio versions.

Virginia Link
Madison, WI USA
===============================================================
Ed Savitz wrote:
As we all know, writing technical documents has changed with the technology.
But so have _we_ as readers. When I first started teaching, there were
guidelines for proposals for courses.

Number of pages,
Materials required,
a day-by-day sample lesson plan
and the like.

Never were graphics or illustrations mentioned.

I recently received a style guide for proposals including the same topics as
above but with a _long_ list of requirements for graphic inclusions:

No illustration shall be smaller than one inch in either direction except
for bullets or other marking elements,

Screen captures of copyrighted materials must be labeled as such with the
appropriate copyright (C), registered (R), trade mark (TM) or service mark
(SM) symbols, etc.

The times, they are a-changin'

Ed Savitz
sg94cshj -at- post -dot- ocs -dot- drexel -dot- edu


Previous by Author: Re: QUERY RE:"Going Online" workshop
Next by Author: Re: Procedural Steps
Previous by Thread: WARNING:Graphic_Language
Next by Thread: Interleaf vs. FrameMaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads