TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: WARNING:Graphic_Language From:"Virginia J. Link" <LINKVI -at- MAIL -dot- STATE -dot- WI -dot- US> Date:Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:04:10 -0600
Perhaps soon proposal and document production guidelines/standards (and
software capabilities) will also include converting documents to formats
accessible to the visually impaired, such as large print and braille, and
Madison, WI USA
Ed Savitz wrote:
As we all know, writing technical documents has changed with the technology.
But so have _we_ as readers. When I first started teaching, there were
guidelines for proposals for courses.
Number of pages,
a day-by-day sample lesson plan
and the like.
Never were graphics or illustrations mentioned.
I recently received a style guide for proposals including the same topics as
above but with a _long_ list of requirements for graphic inclusions:
No illustration shall be smaller than one inch in either direction except
for bullets or other marking elements,
Screen captures of copyrighted materials must be labeled as such with the
appropriate copyright (C), registered (R), trade mark (TM) or service mark
(SM) symbols, etc.
The times, they are a-changin'
sg94cshj -at- post -dot- ocs -dot- drexel -dot- edu