Re: Tech. writing list

Subject: Re: Tech. writing list
From: "Wing, Michael J" <mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:46:39 -0600

> Eric Ray asked about how various people handle numbered
> steps. My favorite approach is the one used by WordPerfect
> (if memory serves): number the actual step, boldface that
> entire line, then provide the nonessential details as an
> indented paragraph beneath the step. This has one great
> advantage over other approaches: it separates the step from
> the elaboration (thus, expert or uninterested users can
> skip the elaboration, but others have it immediately
> available).

<snip>

> --Geoff Hart @8^{)} geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca

I'm adverse to bolding the entire line. This is because in the
documentation that I have handled, command syntax, command sequence,
button/form/field names, and other items that are referenced exactly as
they appear, are bold. For example,

1) Select the <Start bold> Format-Text-Font <End bold> command.

does not work if the entire line is bold.



Mike Wing

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/
_/ Michael Wing
_/ Principal Technical Writer
_/ Infrastructure Technical Information Development
_/ Intergraph Corporation
_/ Huntsville, Alabama
_/ (205) 730-7250
_/ mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com
_/


Previous by Author: Re: Procedural Steps
Next by Author: Word 7: Is it a hog?
Previous by Thread: Tech. writing list
Next by Thread: Reviewers and Resource Guides


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads