TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Screen-sized Web Pages? From:Shmuel Ben-Artzi <sba -at- NETMEDIA -dot- NET -dot- IL> Date:Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:51:51 +0200
>> Peter Ring wrote:
>>> I think it's time to stop this nonsense. Why?
>>> "Screen sized websites" is a phantom! Whether it is "screen sized"
>>> or not depends also a lot on which browser you use, the settings of
>>> the browser, and your screen resolution.
Essentially I agree with what you are saying here. I feel though that one
important element of the page vs. screen argument is missing from this
entire thread. You said that the "screen-sized website" is a phantom.
Correct. But what about "screen-sized digestible data chunks"? I do not, as
a general policy, limit myself in Web design to fitting a full page onto a
screen. Way too many variables to contend with. But what I do try very hard
to do is to make complete thoughts, concepts, groupings and the like fit
onto a single screen. Scrolling through a document is no problem for most
users. Not being able to peruse a single, definable block of data at a
single glance, though, is more frustrating.
All right, so I won't always succeed. Necessarily large data chunks may fill
more than one screen on a subnotebook and smaller ones will undoubtedly
overlap on a 21" monitor. But on the whole, the documents will be more
easily comprenended and utilized.
Data Systems Manager
Ulpan Akiva Netanya
sba -at- netmedia -dot- net -dot- il