TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Killer -Reply From:Kris Olberg <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 13 Nov 1996 11:45:48 -0800
At 12:09 PM 11/13/96 +0000, you wrote:
>> Saying that users "expect" the word "abort" is a dangerous
>> assumption. How do you know this?
>Because it *is* so commonly used (otherwise, we wouldn't be arguing
>about it, would we?) Remember "abort, retry, fail?" (hmm... now I
>see... the whole thing is a fiendish plot by Bill Gates...)
Your logic is flawed. One cannot deduce that users expect to see certain terminology simply because it's used a few times in DOS messages (or anywhere else for that matter).
>> To most audiences, what's the difference between saying
>> "aborts" and "stops"?
>To me, "abort" means that everything about the process will be
>discarded -- it will be as if I never even attempted to start that
>process. "Stop" means stop the process where it is right now, but
>anything that has already been done is still done. But that's just
>me. I'd like to see some studies done so we'll all know what to
My question was really rhetorical. Your post (and other similar ones) define "abort" and "stop" from your (or the poster's) perspective, not the audience's.
In the end, though, Tracy, you're right about a study. Only research would definitively tell us whether we're making a mistake by using "abort" instead of "stop." One would think that a study of this type has already been done, but I have seen nothing of its kind. Maybe someone else has. Anyone?
kjolberg -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com (preferred)
kjolberg -at- aol -dot- com
kjolberg -at- msn -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com
102031 -dot- 3556 -at- compuserve -dot- com
s -dot- othoudt -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net