TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Readability of extended list items? From:Beth Mazur <mazur -at- MAYA -dot- COM> Date:Sun, 1 Dec 1996 13:01:57 -0500
I'm having a discussion with a coworker regarding the readability of extended
list items (as opposed to indented or flush with the left margin) in
For example, consider the following:
Level One Head
This is a paragraph. Note the indent from the level one head.
Level Two Head
This is also a paragraph. Level three heads have the same indent as
paragraphs and level two heads, but their typography is different in
terms of weight and size.
However, extended list items have an initial margin in between the
paragraph/level two head/level three heads and the level one heads.
o This is a bullet item.
o This is a second bullet item whose text will wrap to the left margin
of paragraphs and the level two and three heads.
This is a paragraph. Note that extended lists also includes numbered
lists as well as bullet lists.
1. The first step is to...
2. The second step is ... As with bullet lists, the text will wrap to
the left margin of paragraphs.
The two resources I have at hand do not address this issue in terms
of readability. A WWW search hasn't been too productive. And I can't
recall ever *seeing* an extended list in print, although my coworker
tells me that it's common.