Who Checks My Little Dog Checkers?

Subject: Who Checks My Little Dog Checkers?
From: Alexander Von_obert <avobert -at- TWH -dot- MSN -dot- SUB -dot- ORG>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 19:29:02 +0100

Hello,


* Antwort auf eine Nachricht von Robert Plamondon an All am 09.01.97

RP> From: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>

RP> The question on the floor is, "Should we add intentional errors
RP> in order to trap inattentive reviewers?"

You defenitely must to do some quality control. If they sign your papers
without finding them you can prove that they were inattentive. You should
clearly document that.

Another question is how these people will react to your traps. True
professionals should understand your intentions.


Greetings from Germany,
Alexander

--
Alexander von Obert, Urbanstr. 2, 90480 Nuernberg, Germany
Free-lance Technical Writer (electronics, software)
Voice +49-911-403903, Fax +49-911-403904, BBS +49-911-403905 (FIDO 2:2490/1719)

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Moire pattern in screenshots under w95 Help?
Next by Author: Converting a Bitmap Logo
Previous by Thread: Re: Who Checks My Little Dog Checkers?
Next by Thread: Re: Minimalism


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads