Re: Salary Creep (Re: A Sticky Situation)

Subject: Re: Salary Creep (Re: A Sticky Situation)
From: Eric Haddock <eric -at- ENGAGENET -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 11:35:39 -0600

>"well, so-and-so now has two kids, so we should pay him more than x, who
has none".

This kind of sexist thinking was (is?) the rationale behind paying women
less than men for the very same job and it's a behavior we cannot
allow--ever. Whenever you see this kind of ridiculous needs-based thinking
going on you need to speak up, because it will not go away and it will only
continue to have wider application.



Regards from beautiful Wisconsin!

http://www2.pitnet.net/moonlion mailto:moonlion -at- full-moon -dot- com
http://www.engagenet.com/ mailto:eric -at- engagenet -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: "View Doc Source" & Netscape)
Next by Author: Re: "Good" Web Pages
Previous by Thread: Re: Salary Creep (Re: A Sticky Situation)
Next by Thread: Re: Salary Creep (Re: A Sticky Situation)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads