TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Giving credit to med tech eds From:d r <writeagain -at- JUNO -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:42:30 EST
I will be doing a series of articles within the same pubilcation. On my
editorial staff will include 2 or more technical medical editors within
the same specific field. If one article was "tech-med-edited" by Dr. Joe
and the other was "tech-med-edited" by Dr.John, if I myself receive a
byline for each article, how can I differentiate between which physician
edited which piece?
Should it read something like:
Medical Issues of the Day
by D.R. Medical Editor:
or is it enough to list both in my masthead and have the public figure
out which did which? Also, is this way fair to both editors?
I thought about having both editors edit both articles but I saw that in
a technical medical journal and it got weird when they disagreed. Their
disagreements were listed, and done so in such a way as to make the
presentation look like a school project. (I take that back. I have seen
more professional looking school projects)