Re: Editorial and technical reviews

Subject: Re: Editorial and technical reviews
From: John Ahlstrom <jahlstro -at- CISCO -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:10:50 -0800

Sue:

If you mean by "editorial review" the
same thing that I mean, why would anyone
in their [sic] right mind ever ask programmers
to do an editorial review?

By editorial review I mean everything but
technical accuracy.

I have worked with more than 100 incredibly intelligent
programmers and mediocre ones and poor ones
and have seen any "editorial review" skills in
maybe 2.

John Ahlstrom
jahlstrom -at- cisco -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Knowing prog. lang. +s to a TW's $?
Next by Author: Re: Estimating time
Previous by Thread: Re: Editorial and technical reviews
Next by Thread: Editorial and technical reviews


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads