TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:What We Call Ourselves From:"George F. Hayhoe" <gfhayhoe -at- SCESCAPE -dot- NET> Date:Sun, 9 Feb 1997 14:09:49 -0500
The act of naming is implicitly powerful. What we call ourselves enables us
to differentiate ourselves from other employees, enhance our clout in the
company, and often add interesting tasks to our responsibilities.
There's been a lot of discussion on the list about whether we're technical
writers or technical communicators. Yesterday, Robert Plamondon remarked,
"The STC never hesitates to call a spade an implement."
Most of us on this list can probably be classified as technical
writers--but not all. Some are editors, indexers, illustrators, designers,
managers, or teachers. Still others don't fit any of those classifications.
But we're all technical communicators.
No disrespect to Robert intended, but not all implements are spades.