TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Categories vs. Alphabetical From:Ginna Watts <gwatts -at- PIM -dot- BC -dot- CA> Date:Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:29:24 -0800
We're in the middle of upgrading our software from DOS to NT. The software
is essentially a collection of 'modules' (it developed that way due to DOS
memory requirements etc., and just stayed that way...). Some come in the
'core package', some come in extra package collections - there are about 25
Now in the NT GUI they are being divided into rough categories. That is,
Utilities, Cartographic, Topology etc., even though a customer may have none
of the modules in the category. (They're calling it advertising). The old
manual had docs for just about all modules, and it's arranged
alphabetically. (Note that even though the modules might fall into general
categories, they are not usually used in any particular sequence, and there
are no relationships, even within'categories'. They are nearly completely
My boss has suggested that we organise the manual along the lines of the GUI
anc separate modules into categories, but I'm in favour of sticking with the
Any suggestions to back me up / refute my arguments?
Ginna Watts - Technical Writer
Pacific International Mapping Corp.
gwatts -at- pim -dot- bc -dot- ca