TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Blasted Apostrophes (Was Years v. Years') From:"Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Thu, 27 Feb 1997 07:33:39 -0700
Virginia Hayden wrote:
>We have an ongoing debate here as to whether a software manual should be
>titled Users Guide or User's Guide. What's the consensus out there?
I prefer to drop the apostrophe in this case. The reference guide I like
to use (The New York Public Library Writer's Guide to Style and Usage)
says the following:
"Although an apostrophe is not incorrect in terms like the following,
increasingly it is omitted when the sense of the term is descriptive
rather than possessive--that is, when *for* is meant rather than *of*."
It gives the following examples:
I think omitting it is a much simpler solution than worrying about
whether is should be users' or user's.
It did not escape me that the very reference I cited uses the apostrophe
in its own title: Writer's Guide.
>parksb -at- emh1 -dot- hqisec -dot- army -dot- mil