TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Resumes and Perfection From:John Fisher <fisher -at- EPIC -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:19:54 -0800
I've finally been drawn into this discussion. When I
am in a hiring position, I reject out-of-hand resumes
with mistakes in them; typos or otherwise. It's not
because I'm looking for a writer who needs no proofing
or editing. I'm looking for a particular mindset.
In my view, your resume is the most important tool you
have when you are shopping for a job. Until you interview,
it *is* you to the prospective employer. (Discussions of
networking aside, please.) Therefore, if an applicant
has less regard for his or her most important tool
in applying for a job than to ensure it is perfect, what
level of care are they going to invest in my company's
And, please, don't you think the idea (as has been
proposed here) that it's not possible to produce a
"perfect" resume is absurd?
I hope my tone is not too sharp. It's not meant to be.
To all of those out there with whom I agree, you are
correct (in a most self-evident way), and to those
with whom I disagree, well, er, ah...you have the
right to be wrong on occasion.