TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:MAPs (military acronomic plurals) From:jsokohl -at- CAMPBELLSOFT -dot- COM Date:Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:34:52 -0600
Fred Ridder (ridderf -at- dialogic -dot- com) wrote, in part:
>The last time I looked at Mil spec standards (which was >admittedly
some years ago, thank God...) they were very specific >that plurals of
abbreviations and acronyms must be formed by >appending an apostrophe
as well as an "s".
FWIW, I'd have to correct this. Miitary specifications I've used over
the years (not now but from '80-'92) are clear that you simply add an
_s_ to form plurals.
According TRADOC Reg 25-30 (dated 30 Mar 90), "Add a lowercase _s_ to
form the plural of most acronyms: LAWs, MOSs, NCOs, SOPs." Also, the
regulation states: "Do not add an _s_ to form the plurals of acronyms
whose meanins are plural: 'MOUT [military operations on urbanized
terrain] are part of the operational concept.'"
Also: "Singular and plural abbreviations are _usually_ identical: amt
for amount or amounts; div for division or divisions; hr for hour or
hours; km for kilometer or kilometers; BUT p for page yet pp for
As another reference, check out AR 25-30, The Army Integrated
Publishing and Printing Program. Also, one of TRADOC Reg 25-30's
references is the Chicago Manual of Style.
Manager of Documentation
Campbell Software, Inc.