TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Years(') of experience From:John Ahlstrom <jahlstro -at- CISCO -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:56:33 -0800
Geoff Hart wrote:
> One thing to remember is that some phrases, such as "2
> years [or years'] experience", are idiomatic, and thus
> immune to analysis logic and grammar. Grammatically, it
> would probably be "2 years' experience" because, as others
> have noted, it is "the experience of [possessed by] two
> years". It's still an awkard phrase.
How in the name of all the angels (idiomatic emphatic)
can a year possess anything? Be composed of months, days
and so forth but be the owner of?
jahlstrom -at- cisco -dot- com
Paranoia means having all the facts.
-- Wm Burroughs