years vs years'

Subject: years vs years'
From: Bruce Brill <Bruceb -at- ACCENTSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 13:23:20 +0200

<<On: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:22:42 -0500
Joanne from: cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU wrote
Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years':

Melissa & Kevin

You're bringing up an old form which still holds: Two years'
experience; a week's time, an hour's wait, three days' work...

The Chicago Manual of style (among
others) will explain that this is not your garden-variety possessive;
it's based on the genitive case (yeah, English used to have one) which
is the case that governs belonging, or possession.


Hi Joanna & all,

My initial feeling on this question was to agree with Joanna and The
Chicago Manual of Style and opt for using the apostrophe; but,
precisely thanks to both Joanna's reference to The Chicago Manual of
Style, I have changed my mind. Note: One could reword the title of
_The Chicago Manual of Style_ to "_The Chicago Style Manual_", but
never "_The Chicago Style's Manual_." Therefore, thanks to "_The
Chicago Manual of Style_," [quotes here indicate a title, not
ridicule] I dare to disagree with _The Chicago Manual of Style_.

Bruce Brill

Odd Request? Check Website:
Bruce Brill <bruceb -at- accentsoft -dot- com>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Parentheses with other Punctuation - Question
Next by Author: years vs years'
Previous by Thread: Re: Dr. Seuss as Technical Writer
Next by Thread: years vs years'

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads