TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:years vs years' From:Bruce Brill <Bruceb -at- ACCENTSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 3 Mar 1997 16:47:33 +0200
<<On: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:22:42 -0500
Joanne from: cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU wrote
Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years':
Melissa & Kevin
You're bringing up an old form which still holds: Two years'
experience; a week's time, an hour's wait, three days' work...
The Chicago Manual of style (among
others) will explain that this is not your garden-variety possessive;
it's based on the genitive case (yeah, English used to have one) which
is the case that governs belonging, or possession.
Hi Joanna & all,
My initial feeling on this question was to agree with Joanna and The
Chicago Manual of Style and opt for using the apostrophe; but,
precisely thanks to both Joanna's reference to The Chicago Manual of
Style, I have changed my mind. Note: One could reword the title of
_The Chicago Manual of Style_ to "_The Chicago Style Manual_", but
never "_The Chicago Style's Manual_." Therefore, thanks to "_The
Chicago Manual of Style_," [quotes here indicate a title, not
ridicule] I dare to disagree with _The Chicago Manual of Style_.