TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Binders vs. Books From:jsokohl -at- CAMPBELLSOFT -dot- COM Date:Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:21:33 -0600
I weigh in heavily _against_ binders...mostly because I consider the
design a throwback to the '80s. Also, there are usability &
connotative objections to binders, esp. 9x12 (inch) ones--most people
don't have desk space sufficient to use them.
Perfect-bound books do have usability issues (can't lay flat easily,
unless you use "lay-flat" binding, which is even more expensive).
That's why we settled on wire-o binding. Books lay flat, yet they're
bound. Being bound provides permanence and a sense of authority to me,
while binders imply that the documentation's less "real" (these are
aesthetic judgments of mine, not researched results). Anyway, the 7x9
(or 7x8.5) inch design seems to work. Also, I like having our
documentation simulate (to a certain physical space degree) or evoke
"commercial" doc--so many people now have computers in their homes as
well as work areas that they're used to some form of paper
Long ramble to say I'd vote against binders. And I'd vote against
change bars. And our motto here is, "Use point pages (38.1, 38.2,
38.3, etc.), go to jail--it's the law!"
Manager of Documentation
Campbell Software, Inc.