TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Paul J. Sisler wrote:
[taken out of context]
Yes there are crappy writers everywhere. But do we
> *really* expect engineers (I'm certain some are fine writers)
> to write as well as people who make a living doing it?
> Certainly not. Otherwise, programmers would still be writing manuals
> and online help (sorry, software bias here).
> paul -at- sisler -dot- com
Paul, Thanks for the post. This gives me an excuse to change the subject
and ask a question I've been curious about for some time now. I keep
reading job postings for tech writers. When I get down to the
requirements section I see C/C++ often and then I am pretty
uncomfortable. What level of proficiency in C/C++ are the prospective
employers actually asking for? Do they want the tech writer to have the
ability to write commercial grade C/C++ programs or do they want the
applicant to be able to discuss this code in an informed way with the
SME? It seems to me there is a world of difference here.
I guess what I'm saying is if the tech writer can write commercial grade
programs then why isn't he/she looking for a job as a programmer rather
than a tech writer?
Shorter Rankin, MBA
attracted to REXX, BASIC, Turbo Pascal, HTML etc but not C/C++