Re: STC Annual Conference

Subject: Re: STC Annual Conference
From: Jim Purcell <jimpur -at- MICROSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 09:45:43 -0800

Garret Romain points out:

>>It helped that I was active in my local chapter, and that my director had
>>been active in his. It also helped that I had several old proceedings in my
>>personal library, and I could show the cool topics we cover every year. But
>>mostly, it's the degree of enthusiasm you bring to the discussion.
>Being active in your local STC chapter is the number 2 way of getting sent to
>the annual conference. The number 1 way is presenting a paper. Presenting a
>paper confers prestige on your company, and it connotes a certain seriousness
>on your part, a commitment that a conference trip won't just be a junket.
>Jim Purcell
>jimpur -at- microsoft -dot- com
>My opinions, not Microsoft's

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Java and ActiveX
Next by Author: Improving the UI
Previous by Thread: Re: STC Annual Conference
Next by Thread: Other passwords to nerddom (was CHAT: "Intercom" article)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads