Re: Value added by technical documentati

Subject: Re: Value added by technical documentati
From: "Wilcox, John (Contractor)" <wilcoxj -at- WDNI -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 14:37:00 -0800

From: Virginia J. Link

So this discussion leads me to my burning issue: where do technical
belong in the development/testing/production phase? If we have to
document/bandage bad UI and programming (and take the heat for manuals
are too big, too costly, too late, blah blah ad nauseum), don't we
belong in the picture long before the code is codified?
Whew! (Head swiveling around back into place) Sorry about that! It
be apparent that this has been bugging me for a few years now. Anybody
been in this situation? Been there, done that?

Nope. You're clearly in unchartered waters, mate. NOT! Sounds all too
familiar. However, I can say very appreciatively that my present job is
a veritable vacation compared to the previous five-year stint. A lot
more money and a lot less stress. So don't give up hope -- there is a
God! My advice to you: Consider working in the real world instead of
for the state! You're beating a dead horse! They thrive on the stuff
you're trying to fix.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: NetHelp anyone
Next by Author: Re: Value added by technical documentati
Previous by Thread: Re: Value added by technical documentati
Next by Thread: Re: Value added by technical documentati

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads