re-UI, TW versus engineers

Subject: re-UI, TW versus engineers
From: Shlomo Ramon <ramsol -at- NETVISION -dot- NET -dot- IL>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 13:06:23 PST

Many thanks to all who promptly satisfied my ignorance of the acronyms UI -
these things are a real plague to the uninitiated
BTW, being a "defrocked" EE myself (HW for hardware, that`is why the
ignorance of UI), and having turned late in life to writing, I cannot agree
more about the relative inability for clear, concise etc, writing shared by
many of my ex-colleagues. sometimes it takes one make sense of the
mumbo-jumbo specs and even speech. I think though that good TWs are
generally properly compensated, at least in this country.
-------------------------------------
Name: Shlomo RAMON
E-mail: ramsol -at- NetVision -dot- net -dot- il
Date: 03/15/97
Time: 13:06:23

This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: UI
Next by Author: FW: re-creativity in technical communication
Previous by Thread: [no subject]
Next by Thread: Fair Wage --revisited


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads