TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: click to add From:"Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:29:48 -0800
At 02:06 PM 3/26/97 -0400, Steven Warren wrote:
> --Geoff Hart said,"Just to throw another log on the fire... I'd actually
> prefer to see most of the imperative instructions we've
> seen during this thread reversed: Rather than "Click Y to
> do X", go with "To do X, click Y". (Rationale: Provide
> context before details. Relevant jargon: "metadiscourse",
> "using advance organisers", etc.)
> This is an interesting point because there are two standards.
> One would include Microsoft standards of To do x, click x. This
> is universal through microsoft documentation. Then again I've always
> been taught to write in active voice (click x, to do x)
> I feel the writer can go either way.
Am I missing something? Both examples are active voice.
Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
Connecting People with Information: http://www.verity.com