Re: PC Processing Power (was Home Alone)

Subject: Re: PC Processing Power (was Home Alone)
From: Barb Philbrick <caslonsvcs -at- IBM -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 21:19:23 GMT

On Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:44:03 -0500, you wrote:

>I'm a software engineer by vocation and a writer by avocation, and I do
>both happily at home on my 486. IMO anything faster than a 386 is
>powerful enough for most applications, certainly for word-processing and
>html development.
Depends what you're doing. My Pentium 133 MHz makes a heck of a
difference for Framemaker, PowerPoint, large Word files, and generally
running Windows '95. I have a 486 that I work on at home occasionally
and it's noticeably slower.

If you run something as hulking as Interleaf (as I do), a faster
machine would be even better.

Barb

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Creativity in Technical Communications (short)
Next by Author: Re: Home Alone
Previous by Thread: Re: PC Processing Power (was Home Alone)
Next by Thread: Re: PC Processing Power (was Home Alone)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads