Re: Usability: Tutorial *chapter* or *manual*

Subject: Re: Usability: Tutorial *chapter* or *manual*
From: Win Day <winday -at- IDIRECT -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 06:33:48 -0400

At 04:32 PM 4/7/97 -0700, Sue Heim wrote:

<SNIP>
>
>So, forget about the cost difference. If you had your choice, would
>you prefer to have a 500 page manual that includes ONE WHOLE CHAPTER
>on learning the program that is 150 pages long? Or would you prefer
>to have a separate "Learning" booklet (likely saddle-stitched, btw)
>and a separate user's guide?
>

I'd prefer a separate booklet. Unfortunately, my client doesn't, so we
include the tutorial chapter in the larger manual (ours generally run about
250 pages, plus index).

Win
-------------------------
Win Day
Technical Writer/Editor
Email: winday -at- idirect -dot- com

=====================================
"I have learned that to get a job done and have
fun in it is about all you can get out of life."

- Jessie Tarbox Beals
=====================================

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Friday afternoon humour
Next by Author: Re: What kind of docs do you do?
Previous by Thread: Re: Usability: Tutorial *chapter* or *manual*
Next by Thread: Usability: Tutorial *chapter* or *manual*


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads