TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
If learning to touch-type on a Selectric makes one a pounder, what does
learning on a manual do? By that reasoning, I ought to be more than a
pounder.... Fact is, I've seen young folks who probably never used either
a manual or an electric do an excellent imitation of a pile driver on a
computer keyboard. No, if you like to pound, you like to pound. It's all
right, we understand. Everything will be just fine....
(Slightly) more seriously, if you can pound on a clacker, why can't you
pound on a softie? Pounders' need for clackers says something about why
they pound. It would be interesting to see if there's a correlation
between whether one likes to type and whether one is a pounder. (I hear
there are people with degrees in technical writing who can touch-type but
hate typing. Kind of like a race driver who hates driving.)
It is almost always difficult to switch keyboards, but after going from
manuals to electrics to mag-cards to electronics to Apple IIs I figured
I'd better be adaptable. Sure, objectively bad keyboards do exist, but
it's mostly (MOSTLY, I said) a matter of what you're used to.
In '85-86 a pal and I used CP/M systems with the smoothest, quietest
keyboards you can imagine -- not mushy by any means, but firm and
clickless. Shortly after switching to IBM-type micros with IBM-type
clackers he said, "These machines are great, but I sure do miss my old
keyboard." Well, here in Taiwan, you have to look _hard_ to find anything
but a clacker. Now the same guy won't look at a softie, and he gets
evasive when I mention his earlier statement.
Me, I used a softie at work and a clacker at home very happily for many
years -- but we were living in a barn of an apartment with my workroom at
one end and the bedrooms at the other. Then we moved into a much smaller
place, so I switched to a softie. In addition, my desk at work is in a
cul-de-sac, so I prefer a softie there, too, for my own sake as well as
those of others. (If I were still in the sales and marketing group's
area, though -- think "S-M" and you'll have the picture -- I would haul
out the Northgate superclacker -- and maybe some other assets I keep in
reserve -- and go to town. But I definitely prefer softies now.)
Bill McClain (AlumsHubby -at- aol -dot- com) wrote --
> I'd rather have less audible feedback and more quiet. Maybe I'm wrong, but
> it seems that they take less effort to type on, so I'm more comfortable after
> long stretches of text entry.
It bears repeating that I use the keyboard -- the useful, necessary keys,
not the wasted plastic outside the QWERTY block -- not only for text
entry but for everything -- EVERYTHING -- except drawing bitmaps (and it
would be ridiculously easy to write software that let you work on bitmaps
through the QWERTY block almost as conveniently as you can with a
> Unlike practically everybody who's responded, I like the soft, mushy kinds
> of keyboards...but can't figure out who makes, where to buy. And I wonder if
> anybody else prefers that style.
Yup. I've been using an Acer Accufeel for a few months now and like it a
lot. Had a Kanrich before that; the feel was OK but some of the keys
started making loud popping sounds after about a month so I chucked it.
The Accufeel's right Shift key had a tendency to stick, so I put a small,
firm piece of foam rubber under it and it has worked perfectly ever
since. I like the Accufeel almost as much as I like the keyboard on my
Toshiba laptop. I've heard good things about Toshiba desktop systems'
Carolyn Haley (dcma -at- ct1 -dot- nai -dot- net) wrote --
> I equate contemporary PC keyboards with Chiclet gum pieces.
"Chiclet keyboard" is a jargon term used extensively in the industry for
a certain cheap kind of keyboard rarely seen nowadays except, I *think*,
on point-of-sale terminals -- the kind with a continuous membrane top,
bumps (and sometimes not even those) for keys, and no action to speak of.
Several people seem to be sold on IBM PS/2 keyboards. Never saw one and
don't want to. IBM moved Ctrl out of the home row in 1986. A pox on 'em.
dski -at- cameonet -dot- cameo -dot- com -dot- tw