Re: Is PageMaker Growing in Popularity?

Subject: Re: Is PageMaker Growing in Popularity?
From: Buck & Tilly Buchanan <writer -at- DHC -dot- NET>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 14:18:38 -0500

Jane Bergen wrote:
>
> On 12 Apr 97 at 15:55, Bruce Byfield wrote:
>
> > I seem to be hearing more and more references to PageMaker being
> > used for documentation. Does anybody else have the same impression?

We used Ventura (through v4.2) for years and found it adequate for most
everything pre-online. When v5.0 came out, the bugs were so prevalent
that a Ventura Bugs magazine was published for a couple of years.
Version 6.0 was also pretty bad. I've heard 7.0 is okay, but I'll never
take the chance again.

Buck Buchanan
writer -at- dhc -dot- net
Arlington, TX

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Managing Help Files
Next by Author: Re: overseas work
Previous by Thread: Re: Is PageMaker Growing in Popularity?
Next by Thread: Re: Is PageMaker Growing in Popularity?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads