TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Microsoft Manual of Style From:"Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:15:48 -0700
>>> >> "Avoid using the plural "mice"; if you
>>> >> need to refer to more than one mouse,
>>> >> use "mouse devices"."
>>> >> The word "mouse" is acceptable for the singular.
>>> >> Makes sense to me.
>Tracy Boyington replied:
>>People are used to calling it a mouse. Fine for singular.
>>For plural, I think "mice" sounds dopey. "Mouses" sounds worse.
>>"Mouse devices" makes for an elegant workaround, IMO.
But if the device has been labeled a "mouse" because of its vague
resemblance to the rodent, why not extend the metaphor to all forms of
the word. More than one mouse is mice, whether you're talking about the
mammal or the pointing device. If, instead of mouse, the inventor had
decided to call it a mole, I bet no one would have any problem with
referring to more than one as moles.
>parksb -at- emh1 -dot- hqisec -dot- army -dot- mil