Re: Paper for a technical proposal

Subject: Re: Paper for a technical proposal
From: "Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:09:41 -0700

>Diane Williams wrote:
>>>Absolutely do NOT waste money on fancier or heavier production materials
>for this document!<<

Probably a good idea. The proposal reviewers will probably admire the
nicer paper, but it won't affect their decision in the long run.
>
>>>However, do be sure to churn out a really good executive summary,
>because that is all that's likely to be read by the majority of
>perusers! <<

Not true. I work for the government and I've sat on source selection
boards. Your proposal will be read from cover to cover.

>>>Make sure you cross-reference like crazy so folks can easily
>spot tables and charts, which--like pictures--can equal 1000 words! A
good contents page and index, I think, are critical.<<

Absolutely. Excellent advice.

>Bev Parks
>parksb -at- emh1 -dot- hqisec -dot- army -dot- mil
>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Faces Website
Next by Author: Re: Microsoft Manual of Style
Previous by Thread: Re: Paper for a technical proposal
Next by Thread: Re: Paper for a technical proposal


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads