Re: ISO Standard for Warnings?

Subject: Re: ISO Standard for Warnings?
From: "Eric Haddock, Q.P." <ehaddock -at- ENGAGENET -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:27:38 -0500

>As usual, _Science and Technical Writing: A Manual of Style_, Philip Rubens,
>ed., doesn't disappoint. The advice from page 452 is:
>
>- Warning inform the reader of possible bodily injury if procedures are not
>followed exactly,
>- Cautions alert the reader to possible equipment damage if procedures are
>not followed correctly, and
>- Notes inform the reader wirher of a general rule for a procedure or of
>exceptions to such a rule.


How I treat warnings are:

Warning = Serious injury or death if text not followed.
Caution = Minor injury and/or product failure if text not followed.
Notes = Information which should be particularly emphasized to assist the
user.






Regards from beautiful Wisconsin! :)

Me --> http://www2.pitnet.net/moonlion mailto:moonlion -at- full-moon -dot- com
Work --> http://www.engagenet.com mailto:eric -at- engagenet -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: What do you call that thingamajig
Next by Author: Re: What the heck do you call it when...
Previous by Thread: Re: ISO Standard for Warnings?
Next by Thread: Re: ISO Standard for Warnings?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads