TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>The old WordPerfect (I'm not up on the current release of this software)
>had a much superior method. You could create a "concordance" file--a
>separate file with just a list of index words. WordPerfect would compare
>this file against the doc file (if you had Master/Sub documents, then to
>all files) and build the index. How I wish Frame had something like this...
I'm glad it doesn't. There is nothing worse for the reader than a
concordance (except possibly no index at all, but it's a close call).
It is incredibly frustrating to look up fifteen instances of a word
that is simply mentioned on a page.
A well-done index includes words that are not included in the book at
all ("template - see style sheet") and variations on phrases
("American robin," "robin, American" - the index in Peterson's Field
Guide doesn't include these kinds of items and it drives me nuts).
Yes, it's boring, time-consuming, and tedious, but it's hardly worth
doing if you don't do it well.