TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Education on Resume From:Alexia Prendergast <alexiap -at- SEAGATESOFTWARE -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 12 May 1997 15:33:48 -0400
I, like someone else mentioned earlier, value folks
who are curious and like learning -- whether teaching
themselves, taking classes, etc. If a person had started
several programs and never finished one, I might question
that person about it, but if they had finished a relevant
degree and gotten involved in other studies also, I'd
just think they liked learning. I think this would all
depend on their other qualifications/experience, etc.
I mentioned on my resume that I had a year of post-grad
physics (unrelated to the position) under my belt, which
prompted the interviewer to ask why? I sold
the point that I like finding out how things work --
which was relevant for the job. (I guess what I'm
saying is that relevancy can be relative -- something
unusual might get the interviewer's attention, at
which time you can make your point.)
> I am interested in knowing how hiring managers feel about education
> that was begun, but never finished. Is it better to put it on the
> resume, or just leave it off? I leave mine off because I am afraid it
> makes me look like a quitter. Of course, I have other degrees on my
> resume. If the incomplete degree was my only education, I might see
> it differently.