TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
SUZANNE PYLE wrote:
>When you import into Frame, you have the option of importing by reference
>or copy into document. I can see the benefit in copying directly into the
>doc because Frame doesn't have to go hunting for graphics in some other
>directory which may not be with the source file. But, can you tell me good
>reasons for using the other option (import by reference)? I'm trying to
>make a wise decision on which way to go with graphic importing!
"Import by Reference" uses less disk space. If your graphics are always in
the same directory in reference to the FrameMaker file, it makes no sense
to copy the files into the document and use twice as much disk space for
--Lynn Gold "net.fogey" figmo -at- rahul -dot- net,
Senior Technical Writer, TCSI (weekdays) or lgold -at- tcsi -dot- com
News Anchor, KLIV & KARA News (weekends)
Quote of the week:
"When I watch TV and see those poor, starving kids all over the world, I
can't help but cry. I mean, I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with
all those flies and death and stuff."
-- MARIAH CAREY, WENN (World Entertainment News Network)
and quoted on Radio 1 by both Kevin Greening and Chris Evans