TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML and PDF files From:Dave Meek <meekd -at- WSERVER -dot- DO -dot- LOSRIOS -dot- CC -dot- CA -dot- US> Date:Wed, 21 May 1997 12:16:53 -0700
At 01:36 PM 5/21/97 -0500, Rikki Mitman wrote:
>There seems to be a marked preference for HTML over PDF, and I'm
>wondering why. My experience with each is admittedly limited; however,
>since PDF files preserve your formatting and present consistently (not
>according to browser settings), it seems like that would be the better
>choice. What gives?
CAVEAT: My experience with PDF is severely limited. With that in mind:
PDF files are usually larger than HTML files. Larger means more download
time. Also, PDF files *might* not be searchable external to the document
and Acrobat Reader (I still haven't found a definitive answer on this),
though you should be able to get around this with an HTML "front page" that
has links to PDF documents.
As a rule of thumb, use PDF for documents having:
Extensive use of formatting
A variety of fonts
Extensive use of display features, such as graphics
A need to print with formatting maintained
Use HTML for documents having:
Little or no formatting