Re: HTML and PDF files

Subject: Re: HTML and PDF files
From: Stephen Victor <svictor -at- HOUSTON -dot- GEOQUEST -dot- SLB -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 13:51:13 -0500

Mitman, Rikki wrote:
> There seems to be a marked preference for HTML over PDF, and I'm
> wondering why. My experience with each is admittedly limited; however,
> since PDF files preserve your formatting and present consistently (not
> according to browser settings), it seems like that would be the better
> choice. What gives?

On the net, viewing pdf files is a bit of a pain because you have to
download and install a viewer program (ok, you only have to do that
once, but the extra effort is a deterrent for many). Then you have to
download the .pdf file before you can even view it. Viewing HTML, by
comparison, is almost instantaneous.

When distributing documents, file size is an important consideration.
pdf files are fairly large, while html files are relatively small ASCII
text files. Graphic files are the most sizeable part of an HTML
document. Of course (recalling the Frame graphics thread of a few days
ago), with pdf files, there are no separate graphics files to worry

Stephen P. Victor Phone: (713) 513-2552
Technical Writer, Software Training Fax: (713) 513-2019
Schlumberger GeoQuest svictor -at- houston -dot- geoquest -dot- slb -dot- com
5599 San Felipe, Suite 1700
Houston, Texas 77056 USA

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: A clue on HTML Help (long)
Next by Author: Re: HTML and PDF files
Previous by Thread: HTML and PDF files
Next by Thread: Re: HTML and PDF files

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads