TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Advice on digital cameras (video capture) From:JIMCHEVAL -at- AOL -dot- COM Date:Tue, 27 May 1997 12:52:44 -0400
In a message dated 97-05-27 11:48:28 EDT, Robert -dot- Morrisette -at- EBAY -dot- SUN -dot- COM (Bob
<< The most effective has been using video pictures of an assembly process.
You play the video and capture the correct frames for editing with PhotoShop
Illustrator, if necessary. >>
Does anyone use Play's Snappy utility? It costs about $200 and works with
conventional video input.
I haven't done any comparisons at all for quality with digital cameras, but
if you'd like an idea of how the results appear, I've got several scenes from
movies done as 'flipbooks' (in animated .GIF's*) on my (actor's) home page
Kind of a kludgey solution, but cheap, and it might work for some of the
* Feel free to copy/share for examples.
Visit Chez Jim: Jim Chevallier's Home Page: http://www.gis.net/~jimcheval