Re: Miller's original 7+/-2 article & Number of bullet points

["Peter Ring, PRC" <prc -at- ISA -dot- DKNET -dot- DK>]

Thanks a lot to Poul Nagai for publishing the link to Miller's
original article.

I have read it (it is worth reading!), and I sincerely recommend
*everybody* in this business:

  1. Do your self a favour.
  2. Read it (again).
  3. Enjoy his good explanation of "chunking" - for free!
  4. Look in the article for scientific solid proof for the 7+/-2
     rule; - or just for more than the vague contours of the rule!

... *before* posting any more "holy 7+/-2 rule" mails to this list,
thus avoiding abusing Miller's name and work, - and the "7+/-2 rule"!

There are NO MORE excuses for not having read it!

PS: To my humble opinion ...
- Chunking is a good tool and "way of thinking" when writing manuals.
- The 7+/-2 rule is a sensible "rule of thumb", valid for processes
  and lists to be *learned by heart*, ONLY ! It is e.g. not relevant
  for checklists, although it can make a checklist easier to use.

> Miller's 1956 article can be found on the Well:
>         http://www.well.com/user/smalin/miller.html


Greetings from Denmark

Peter Ring
PRC (Peter Ring Consultants)
- specialists in user friendly manuals and audits on manuals.
prc -at- isa -dot- dknet -dot- dk
http://isa.dknet.dk/~prc/index.html
- the "User Friendly Manuals" website with links, bibliography, list
  of prof. associations, and tips for technical writers.

 TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot-  Send commands
   to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
  Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/  or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html