Re: Single-step procedures

Subject: Re: Single-step procedures
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 14:35:05 +0800

I don't like the look of either -- a single numbered step or a single
bullet item. Of the two, I do think numbering is more practical.

I've learned from this list that when people search for a procedure
they skim through the manual looking for numbered steps or perhaps
likely-looking subheadings. If this is so then a single bulleted item,
with or without a heading, may be missed.

For the same reason I'm gradually letting go of my lovely, lengthy
lead-ins. Once they find that step 1, they might be tempted to go
back and read one or two very short explanatory paragraphs, but it's
most unlikely that they'll wade through two-thirds of page, no matter
how clear, useful and well-written it is.

Regards
---
Stuart Burnfield This message _Powered by vi_
Functional Software Pty Ltd
mailto:slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Job opening (Documentation manager, Ft. Lauderdale)
Next by Author: Re: Writing novels too?
Previous by Thread: Re: Single-step procedures
Next by Thread: Re: Single-step procedures


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads