Re: Single-step procedures

Subject: Re: Single-step procedures
From: Stephen Martin <smartin -at- RC -dot- GC -dot- CA>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 09:26:59 -0400

Christopher Knight wrote:
>
> A reviewer has just asked me to change this to a number 1 "for
> consistency". I figure a number 1 implies more than one step.

Your reviewer has a strange sense of consistency, and I am in agreement
with you.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Clarified once again ...
Next by Author: Re: Creativity
Previous by Thread: Re: Single-step procedures
Next by Thread: Re: Single-step procedures


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads