Re: Warnings and Cautions

Subject: Re: Warnings and Cautions
From: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 11:09:46 -0700

Using "warning" to mean "danger" strikes me as being a warningous
procedure. It just doesn't evoke the right reaction. If the
procedure presents the user with danger, it should say DANGER.

If you do a man-on-the-street survey, I'll bet that most would
consider "caution" to be a higher level of threat than "warning,"
and that "danger" would be the only one of the three that was
consistently associated with risk of life and limb.

While most people are willing to call a spade an implement,
let's not obfuscate danger. While it may be true that most
workers in some narrow industries know that "warning" means
"danger," I'll bet that all of them know that "danger" means
"danger."

-- Robert

--
Robert Plamondon, High-Tech Technical Writing, Inc.
36475 Norton Creek Road * Blodgett * Oregon * 97326
robert -at- plamondon -dot- com * (541) 453-5841 * Fax: (541) 453-4139
http://www.pioneer.net/~robertp

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Single-step procedures
Next by Author: Re: "Danger, Danger, Will Robinson!"
Previous by Thread: Warnings and Cautions
Next by Thread: Re: Warnings and Cautions


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads